Posts Tagged Victimization

Listen Up, Because…. Time’s Up!

                          



How the “Smart Woman” Got Caught Up in the Drama of a Drug Addict 

This is a true story… and a somewhat embarrassing story. However, if in the telling, this story enlightens other “smart people,” than so be it….

[“And the trouble is, if you don’t risk anything, you risk more” Erika Jong] 

Ladyjustice has always considered herself a knowledgeable person – book smart, analytical, problem solving and possessing enough “street smarts” to know better…  But alas, this was one of the hardest lessons of all – to be played like a fiddle by a master manipulator and not even realize it!  LJ was no match for this person, henceforth to be called “Madam X.” Madam X had a pattern of leading unsuspecting people on a journey to hell and back.  

Ladyjustice should have known better… 

Little did she know at the outset that she would not only be a crime victim again, but also demonstrate an ability to rise above the pain,  and abuse to save the perpetrator’s life…. whatever that was worth.

It all began when this blogger hosted a Woman’s Sunday Brunch gathering within a major hotel in an elite community in central Connecticut.  One Sunday, a new guest, “Madam X” arrived.  She was small in stature, was well scrubbed, freckle faced and appeared “too cute” in looks and personality for words.  In fact, unbeknownst to LJ, she not only strolled in, but rode in on her motorcycle. (Motorcycles are hardly foreign objects to this blogger.  Please refer to past blog- After 30 Years….. (Anniversary Tribute to Don Gore (8-26-1933–4-17-1981) 

Madam X was charming and cast her spell toward LJ even during the first meeting.      It was almost like a dream…  PI’s Denny Griffin or Vito Colucci should have rounded the corner, taken this blogger by the shoulders and said, “Wake up woman, this person is bad news!” But they were nowhere to be found! 

Madam X and LJ became friends, but there was something not quite right about the situation.  This blogger had met others in the past that were in a tough spot, living on the edge for awhile until finances improved.  But LJ should have known that the transient little barn converted apartment was for the wayward and not a “charming fixer-upper.” 

Madam X was down on her luck. She had a job but lived paycheck to paycheck. She was a licensed handyperson, but was working in a hotel catering department.  Madam X was a good cook, skilled at arts and crafts, and voiced goals and aspirations. 

One day while sitting on the couch of her ramshackle apartment, after finishing a call to someone, she warned LJ, “You don’t want to know about my problems,” when an innocent offer of help was made.  LJ had just rescued her stranded with her bike, needing a ride.  (LJ should have walked out the door right then and there.)  

This blogger was oblivious, blinded that “something was not quite right.”  This cute and perky person fed into LJ’s caretaking nature…and Madam X knew it…

Madam X needed a temporary place to stay … so Ladyjustice oblige

d, thinking that it was the right thing to do to help a new friend…. And that our friendship would grow as a result. 

Madam X moved in with her considerable amount of belongings, taking over LJ’s “neat nick condominium” and rearranged her life as never before. 

 

 

Background

Madam X came from a neighboring state, had two sisters.  Both were successful professionals in other geographic areas. Madam X portrayed herself as “the black sheep of the family,” always trying to prove herself, always misunderstood.  If memory serves, her mother was a widow, but dating. 

What Ladyjustice wasn’t aware of initially, was that Madam X had burned many bridges, including her family.  It appeared they were in a state of inertia when LJ desperately called them upon Madam’s first disappearance.(i.e. not in total denial of her problems and former rescues, but not helping her to face the music and suffer the consequences for, such things as losing her driver’s license….. and unbeknownst to this blogger, a drug problem.) 

And so… having a new housemate, Ladyjustice, “Savior of the People” drove Madam X to her hotel job, frequently rising at 4 am to arrive at 6 am  located over the hazardous Avon Mountain.  

Fortuitously, rather than be the constant  chauffer, Ladyjustice decided to put her on her auto insurance as a motorcycle was not always the best means of travel.  Let me say fortuitously again, as one fine day, she borrowed LJ’s Subaru Forrester, fell asleep at the wheel, landed in a ditch and totaled the car, with only a few scratches to her body. 

As time went on, the naiveté on LJ’s part remained and so did the loans of a few dollars here and there (which were accumulating). The good thing is that all expenditures were logged in a book as proof of what was owed (she told herself).  Madam X liked a glass of wine with dinner…every night as it turned out.. which didn’t seem terribly out of place at first?  LJ even sacrificed  Thanksgiving dinner with her family in favor of a twosome, much to her family’s chagrin. 

This blogger wasn’t thrilled with the situation, but kept the thought that the inconveniences were only temporary as soon as she got a better paying job.  The inconveniences mounted and the psychological control and lies began, such that LJ wanted out of the situation altogether.  But Ladyjustice knew Madam X would not go easily.  She was a “hanger on” whose job it was to charm the world. ‘Never afraid physically, but LJ was in a constant state of worry, tired of being manipulated by charm and tired of  beating up oneself for the stupidity of being duped.

By this time, thanks to the insurance company, a new 2003 midnight blue Toyota Matrix was on the premises.  But… there was more to come… 

One night, while Ladyjustice slept, Madam X got up,  “borrowed” LJ’s car keys and stole the new car!  The next morning, the car and Madam X were nowhere to be found.  (Drug addicts are good at disappearing and re-appearing.) 

Ladyjustice had to go to work…but was too ashamed and embarrassed to tell her family members.  She tried unsuccessfully to arrange for continuous rides from co-workers.  In the meantime, LJ did report “the newest incident” to the police immediately. Madam X had no record in the State of Connecticut.  This blogger finally woke up and wanted to have her arrested!  The brand new car was placed on the NCIC-National Crime Information Center’s data base for missing vehicles. 

At this juncture, Ladyjustice had to “swallow her pride” and notify family members for transportation …and for support.  They didn’t see Madam X’s addiction.  They only knew and expressed that she was one of “those people” from the wrong side of the tracks… a user. They were truly concerned for LJ’s welfare. 

It was the first time Ladyjustice had ever seen her mother threaten bodily harm…and her sister wanted to “throw all of her belongings out on the street.”

A plethora of emotions were at work in LJ’s head- anger, disgust, worry, even a little compassion for this criminal.  What made her do it after all?   LJ’s main emotions at the time were incredulousness and  self disappointment for being so easily taken in! 

CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW ANYONE WOULD SINK SO LOW AS TO STEAL THE ONLY TRANSPORTATION AVAILABLE FOR A SINGLE, PHYSICALLY DISABLED PERSON?? 

Ladyjustice just couldn’t get over this fact…. This blogger began to look into eviction procedures – a legal morass.  LJ learned that it was no easy task to evict someone who is not “an official renter.”   Days passed with no word from Madam X and no sign of the car .  Perhaps two weeks came and went… 

LJ discovered the “ace in the hole,” as Madam X’s motorcycle was left on the property.  Sweet revenge!!!  After consulting the police,, or maybe it was an attorney, Ladyjustice asked a neighbor to sell the motorcycle … and he did!

When Madam did show up, dazed and confused, she was totally dumbfounded and “betrayed” that LJ would have sold the motorcycle.  No sense of responsibility was taken, just concern for the motorcycle! 

Long story short, the brand new car was located unscathed (i.e. not stripped) in a high crime area of Hartford.  (Coincidentally, it was exactly  the location in front of the house where LJ’s mother grew up as a child!) The interior was a mess with many a McDonald’s wrapper and a couple hundred miles  on the speedometer.  Upon seeing it, Ladyjustice physically shook and was unable to drive it to the detailing shop. 

And… Big Surprise…. Madam X  stole the car in exchange for drugs.

As she told it,  Madam X had a “once a month cocaine habit” in addition to  an alcohol addiction. 

Second Surprise…  Madam X’s family turned against Ladyjustice for having her arrested.    In truth, she was saving her life… 

This blogger tried to “take the high road” and be supportive of Madam X’s  inpatient Drug Rehabilitation, in which she was a model patient- making LJ arts and crafts projects and colored pictures.  Perhaps LJ was biding her time until the court date.  On the surface, temporary remorse was exhibited by Madam, such that Ladyjustice, always the compassionate one, did not see the value in sending her to jail if she could “be put on the right path.” 

[A bit of trivia for readers,- Did you know that drug and alcohol counselors frequently encourage addicts to color pictures with crayons as it supposedly has a calming effect?  Hah!] 

The court date came and this blogger had her opportunity to list all of the despicable behaviors . Madam X said all of the right things to the judge.  The judge was very surprised at LJ’s generosity  “not to send her to jail, Do not pass go; Do not collect $200”  as they say in Monopoly.

Drug Rehab, urine tests, probation and a halfway house were part of the plan going forward. 

There was a near miss, a potential relapse during this time.  The Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services policies supposedly interfered with the ability to demonstrate a clean versus a dirty test.  The details escape this blogger now.  However, Madam X called LJ  hysterically telling her story , pushed to the brink of purchasing drugs ..and then at the last minute, flushing them down the toilet.  Ladyjustice saw an injustice in the story and dutifully wrote a letter to the Medical Director. 

No Surprise Again…  Madam X never really expressed any remorse to Ladyjustice.  She didn’t achieve the “making amends step” of the 12 step program during the time we were together. Several weeks later, Madam X, a couple of transient friends and her sister arrived with trucks to finally vacate LJ’s condominium. It was a tension filled day, but we made it through. 

A few weeks later, the Medical Director of DMHAS responded to LJ’s letter on Madam’s behalf and promised to do  “staff re-training concerning their policies in the future.”    As a final loose end, LJ tried to do the right thing and notify Madam X of the letter and its promise.  (Why I bothered, I’ll never know…) 

Response to the message left at the halfway house – A call from the local police warning LJ  not to harass Madam X!!  Ladyjustice went to Alanon Meetings and tried to forget…. 

Moral of This Story-  

Had Ladyjustice not bothered in the first place with the “Master Manipulator”, the entire sordid tale would not have happened.  If Ladyjustice had not demonstrated the courage to have Madam X arrested, she would not have had the benefit of drug rehabilitation and the court system “trying to set her straight.”  Lady Justice would have retained the first car and all of the money owed, never to be seen again. 

In other words, even with all of Madam X’s mess-ups and devaluing  of other humans, Ladyjustice saved her life…even if it was against her will…   and felt good about that one and only fact!  (But for the Grace of God finding her in some alley…) 

This blogger owns the same “drug car” today. It currently has 131,526 miles on the speedometer.  When the time comes for the bone yard, the bad memories will vanish with  it.  As for Madam X, who knows where she is 8 years later… Hopefully living a cleaner life!

 

As LJ’s boss always says, “No good deed goes unpunished.”

 

 

 

 

, , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

A Final Act in San Diego by “The Terminator Governor”

“Double, Double Toil and Trouble… Fire Burn and Cauldron Bubble….”

Is this refrain from a chorus of California outraged citizens and lawmakers or could it be from William Shakespeare’s, Macbeth????)

Well, my dear bloggers, I invite you to be the judge…..

Consider this…. We may have the makings of a witches brew for sure…

‘Just the Facts, Ma’am…(as reported by a variety of San Diego and Los Angeles new sources)

1) A well connected Governor on his way out who, along with increasing the State deficit by billions, was frequently “all show and little substance”;

2) A desire by a group of guys to party beyond their geographic confines of Sacramento fueled by alcohol;

3) The denial of entry into a fraternity party;

4) A 22 year old San Diego State University Student named Luis Santos is seemingly in the wrong place at the wrong time, the apartment of his cousin;

5) A fatal stabbing and wounding of three others occurs;

6) A young thug, Ryan Jett, who had previous felony convictions
and was on probation for having a sawed-off shotgun and possessing ammunition at the time of the killing;

7) The defendants originally charged with murder, assault, vandalism, conspiracy to commit an assault and conspiracy to destroy evidence.  Had they been convicted, they both would have faced 25 years to life behind bars.  Now a politically tied defendant may serve only 7 years;

8) A crime victims’ advocacy group called “Crime Victims United California” had the foresight and proactive style to file a civil law suit  on behalf of the Santos family against Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation;

9) The arrogance of a Governor clearly shone through by violating the family’s constitutional rights under Marsy’s Law by illegally commuting the sentence for Esteban Nunez from 16 years to 7 years on his last day in office;

(Fabian Nunez, a Democrat, served as Assembly speaker from 2004 to 2008. He is also a business partner of the governor’s top political adviser at the consulting firm Mercury Public Affairs, according to the Los Angeles Times)

10) San Diego prosecutors state that they are unaware of any other case in which a defendant who entered a plea agreement later had his sentence reduced by commutation.

11) A prime opportunity to showcase Marsy’s Law exists;

(***Please refer to details regarding the 2008 California Marsy’s Law at the end of this blog….)

12) This victim’s family was never notified that a defendant’s original sentence was being commuted and found out via news reports, in direct violation of the California Constitution and statutory authority.

13) Family members of a former state assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez appeared to care only for the creature comforts of their felonious relative, Esteban, by sending him an electronic Kindle that was confiscated by prison staff;

14) A shocked San Diego County District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis:”It re-victimizes Luis’s family, his parents, it blindsided the District Attorney’s Office, and it undermined the criminal justice system.”

“We wanted to make sure that crime victims and prosecutors are notified within a defined time frame when an application for commutation is made in the future,” Dumanis said;

15) Another lawsuit may take place as District Attorney Dumanis said her office may also file a lawsuit in the matter.

16) The potential  birth of new legislation Assembly Bill 648 by Assembly member Nathan Fletcher (AD-75) and Assembly member Marty Block

(AD-78) (As of February 18, 2011)

AB 648 would require that the applicant of a commutation notify the district attorney of the county where the conviction occurred of their intent to apply for a commutation, 30 days before the Governor acts. Current law only requires the district attorney to be notified in the case of a pardon.

The bill would also authorize the district attorney to submit a written recommendation to the Governor for or against a pardon or commutation of sentence. The bill would further require the district attorney to notify the victim of the crime and their family, and allow those individuals to submit a recommendation to the Governor for or against a pardon or commutation of sentence.

AB 648 requires a majority vote by both the Assembly and the Senate and Signature by the new Governor, Jerry Brown.

17) Judge Robert F. O’Neill told Nunez during sentencing that his actions after the crime showed a “callousness to human life — evil.”

18) Defendant Ryan Jett, at the time of sentencing tells the judge that “he will spend the rest of his life honoring Santos’ memory.”

 

Details of the Case:

Just when we think we have a little piece of justice after the arduous investigative and judicial processes are completed, an outgoing Governor rips out the hearts of the Santos family of San Diego, (just like his Terminator character) for a political favor….

Kathy and Fred Santos are the bereaved parents of slain San Diego State University student Luis Santos.  This tragedy occurred on October 22, 2008 when Luis was a 22 year old at San Diego Mesa College was targeted by four others.

A witness told detectives that Santos said carried a “piece” and wouldn’t back down from anyone, and apparently the defendants’ group overheard the remarks. After one of the victims cried out “I’ve been stabbed,” Nunez was overheard to say, “Yeah, I got one of ‘em,” DiCarlo told the judge.

According to court testimony, Esteban Nunez and Ryan Jett, along with Raphael Garcia, traveled from Sacramento to San Diego to party and picked up Leshanor Thomas along the way. Witnesses testified they set upon Santos and several other people after they were denied entry to a fraternity party.

Two co-defendants, 20-year-old Rafael Garcia and 21-year-old Leshanor Thomas, pleaded guilty earlier to lesser charges.

Garcia, of Sacramento, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to destroy evidence and agreed to cooperate with the prosecution. He faced up to three years in prison at his June 24 sentencing.
Thomas, also from Sacramento, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit an assault and assault with a deadly weapon and faced nearly five years behind bars.

A judge last year found that Nunez, Garcia and Jett were “talking smack” and “looking for trouble” at the apartment of Garcia’s cousin in the hours leading up to the fatal stabbing.

Defense attorneys contended their clients were acting in self-defense after a fight broke out. Santos was stabbed once in the heart,” the prosecutor said, adding that the victims were unarmed. After the killing, the defendants drove back to Sacramento returned home burning their bloody clothes and threw their knives into a river.

“They’re all principals,” DiCarlo said. “It doesn’t matter if one wasn’t armed.

Jett’s attorney, Terry Zimmerman, said her client believed he had to defend himself as the fight broke out. Zimmerman said both Santos and Jett were both good young men.
“This was a situational event fueled by alcohol,” Zimmerman told the judge. “This was not a premeditated act.”

“Had they not all acted together, Luis would still be alive,” Deputy District Attorney Jill DiCarlo said.  DiCarlo said the notion that Jett showed restraint by only stabbing Santos once was “absurd.” Santos was fatally stabbed once in the heart,” the prosecutor said, adding that the victims were unarmed.  Garcia and Thomas pleaded guilty to lesser charges.

Defense attorney Brad Patton said Nunez’s sentence was too harsh and Schwarzenegger’s commutation corrected an injustice.
But Luis Santos’ mother, Kathy, who lives in Concord, said Schwarzenegger’s action was strictly a political act.

She said her son was “the entertainer in the family and a people-magnet.”

“We had a perfect family of four,” she told the defendants. “You stole a very important part of our family. I hope you will suffer forever more.”

Fred Santos, father of Luis, said the bill is not intended to take away the governor’s power to grant clemency in certain cases.

“We just want transparency, we want notification,” he said. “Give everybody a chance to comment before a decision is made rather than doing this in a sneaky way like this was done.”

Marsey’s Law: California’s Victims’ Bill of Rights

Marsy’s Law significantly expands the rights of victims in California. Under Marsy’s Law, the California Constitution article I, § 28, section (b) now provides victims with the following enumerated rights:

To be treated with fairness and respect for his or her privacy and dignity, and to be free from intimidation, harassment, and abuse, throughout the criminal or juvenile justice process.

To be reasonably protected from the defendant and persons acting on behalf of the defendant.

To have the safety of the victim and the victim’s family considered in fixing the amount of bail and release conditions for the defendant.

To prevent the disclosure of confidential information or records to the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, which could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victim’s family or which disclose confidential communications made in the course of medical or counseling treatment, or which are otherwise privileged or confidential by law.

To refuse an interview, deposition, or discovery request by the defendant, the defendant’s attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, and to set reasonable conditions on the conduct of any such interview to which the victim consents.

To reasonable notice of and to reasonably confer with the prosecuting agency, upon request, regarding, the arrest of the defendant if known by the prosecutor, the charges filed, the determination whether to extradite the defendant, and, upon request, to be notified of and informed before any pretrial disposition of the case.

To reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present and of all parole or other post-conviction release proceedings, and to be present at all such proceedings.

To be heard, upon request, at any proceeding, including any delinquency proceeding, involving a post-arrest release decision, plea, sentencing, post-conviction release decision, or any proceeding in which a right of the victim is at issue.

To a speedy trial and a prompt and final conclusion of the case and any related post-judgment proceedings.

To provide information to a probation department official conducting a pre-sentence investigation concerning the impact of the offense on the victim and the victim’s family and any sentencing recommendations before the sentencing of the defendant.

To receive, upon request, the pre-sentence report when available to the defendant, except for those portions made confidential by law.

To be informed, upon request, of the conviction, sentence, place and time of incarceration, or other disposition of the defendant, the scheduled release date of the defendant, and the release of or the escape by the defendant from custody.

To restitution.

It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.

Restitution shall be ordered from the convicted wrongdoer in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed, in which a crime victim suffers a loss.

All monetary payments, monies, and property collected from any person who has been ordered to make restitution shall be first applied to pay the amounts ordered as restitution to the victim.

To the prompt return of property when no longer needed as evidence.

To be informed of all parole procedures, to participate in the parole process, to provide information to the parole authority to be considered before the parole of the offender, and to be notified, upon request, of the parole or other release of the offender.

To have the safety of the victim, the victim’s family, and the general public considered before any parole or other post-judgment release decision is made.

To be informed of the rights enumerated in paragraphs (1) through (16).

———————————————————————————————————–

As we stand by for the next chapter, will the Santos Family receive a little piece of justice that was stolen from them?   I don’t know….

 

Double, Double Toil and Trouble… Fire Burn and Cauldron Bubble….

Governor Jerry Brown’s Contact information is:

Governor Jerry Brown
c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160

, , , , , , , ,

4 Comments

History can only be written by the survivors….



As a homicide survivor, I am privileged to author this initial blog in furtherance of understanding, shared information and some degree of comfort for my fellow members of this fast growing “club.”

In 1981, my father was murdered at age 47 by a career criminal whose  many crime credentials included bank robbery, drug dealer and two time murderer.  Those are the credentials I know of… The details of the murder I will save for another chapter.

However, the incredulous nature of our ongoing victimization leads me to think of a number of “FIRSTS” (i.e. those circumstances that appear to have occurred only to our family at the time).  Such “firsts” are aberrations, a series of mistakes, oversights, slights, inefficiencies, acknowledgements and offerings from systems overburdened by humans who were just doing their job or not doing it at all.  Irrespective of the perpetrators actions, such occurrences add insult to injury and have the cumulative effect of an avalanche as time marches on trying desperately to catch up with justice.

I will state that these “FIRSTS” occurred over a six year period (without benefit of any particular order)

FIRST:

As my father did not return home one evening, after checking with friends, neighbors and hospitals, my mother opened the newspaper to learn of his possible demise versus being notified by the Hartford Police.  She exclaimed, “Oh my God, that’s him.  It has to be…..”   (Referring to an article of a missing man found in a green van).

We actually had to call the police ourselves and inquire if the person in the paper was indeed my father. (My mother reported that the detective supposedly covered his hand over the phone’s speaker and announced to others that, “She’s just identified him”)

I’ll never forget walking into the police department and seeing his coat paraded past us in a plastic bag.

Possible Explanation: It had been a bad month for my Dad.  He was stopped at a light that month and a person demanded his wallet.  He had not replaced his identification in his wallet yet.

No Justification:  However, it was a matter of record that as an entrepreneur of several successful businesses in the past, he was a registered used car dealer well known to all with contact information readily available from other sources such as his license plate etc.

Why did this happen in this way?  Were the police too busy, lazy or incompetent?  No one knows…  We have never received a reasonable explanation for such an injustice so early on in the process.

Another FIRST

When my father was killed, there was no specific provision or protection of your employment for crime victim’s participation in a murder trial.  At the time, I was working as a clinical speech-language pathologist in a Rehabilitation hospital.  When I asked for time off to attend the trial,six years later in 1987, hospital Administration was supportive but stated,

“The only time off we have to cover such absences is a maternity leave.”

Solution:  As trial proceedings typically did not start until 10 a.m, I was permitted to write patient notes while waiting for the trial to begin and report to work during any recesses during the three week trial.

Thank God times and rights have changed!

Connecticut is one of the first states in the U.S. to provide employment protection for crime victims.  UnderC.G.S. §54-85b an employer cannot fire, harass or otherwise retaliate against an employee subpoenaed as witness in criminal case or against the crime victim for:

(1) attending court proceedings related to the criminal case; or

(2) being the beneficiary of a restraining order or protective order.

With respect to a protective order issued outside of the state of Connecticut, to receive protection from employer retaliation the order must be registered in Connecticut.

An employer can be found guilty of criminal contempt and fined or imprisoned for violating this law.  Further, a crime victim (or witness) can bring a civil lawsuit against the employer for damages resulting from the violation and for a court order reinstating the victim (or witness) or otherwise rescinding the employer’s unlawful action.

(1981, P.A. 81-186; 2002, P.A. 02-136, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2002.)

Another FIRST

When the homicide occurred in April 1981, the perpetrator was wanted for criminal drug charges in the state of New Jersey and by law had to serve out that sentence prior to conviction of the Capitol murder of my father.

The perpetrator of my father’s murder actually committed murder again one month later when his accomplice in a bank robbery could be identified when his mask was removed.

This double murderer filed for a speedy trial to be extradited back to Connecticut, saying his rights were violated!  Luckily the wise judge in his discretion was not persuaded of this Sixth Amendment right.

The perpetrator, whose name is a type of fish (How appropriate) in the end, was convicted of 50 years to life for felony murder and concurrently, 25 years to life for accessory to murder for the second killing “of his friend/accomplice.”
As luck would have it, the harsher, more absolute determinate sentences were not imposed inConnecticut until July of 1981 (just three months short) of determinant sentencing.

The Difference in Connecticut:

Indeterminate Sentencing in effect until 1981. Imposed minimum and maximum terms and parole board had authority to release offender from prison after completing the minimum term less any “good time” credits earned.

Determinate Sentencing, enacted in 1981, imposes fixed prison term and reduced “good time”. Discretionary release authority shifted from parole board to Department of Correction.

And so, we were caught in the morass of the change of laws in 1981.  ‘ Long story short, “the fish” in jail for those in six years until extradited to Connecticut to stand trial for two murders.  We were re-victimized.  He will technically be eligible for parole in 2013.

Another FIRST
As we all know, during a trial, the victim’s life is put on trial, is open for judgment, character assassination and spectacle.  Anything goes if it will help make the defendant look better.  During the defendant’s time, the relatively new (2nd chair) public defender looked for real and imaginary skeletons in my father’s closet without consideration of our feelings.  This is how it’s done. (My father was not perfect, but his sins did not rise to the level of a death sentence….)

After sitting through this three week trial, listening to the good, the bad and the ugly, this lanky ands seemingly arrogant and insensitive public defender approached me personally and stated,“I’m sorry I have to do this.” I was told by court personnel that such an exchange had neveroccurred before to their knowledge.  It wasn’t much of an offering, but it was an attempt given horrendous circumstances,

Twenty five years later, this same PD is a specialist in criminal and civil law.  Funny how he “cut his teeth” on the trial that was so very important to us…

Another FIRST
Imagine your first exposure to criminal proceedings.  You are used to seeing one jury and one crime presented at a time.  However, this was not the case.  Suddenly I noted that there was testimony regarding the killing of my father followed by testimony of the second crime simultaneously with one jury!   What is this, I thought?  Are they trying to save taxpayers money by doubling up on trials?  I don’t get it….   My Dad deserved center stage!

We had heard that our prosecutor, Atty. A. was very tired after just finishing a long and arduous trial of a well known cardiologist who killed his wife by staging it to look like a car accident.  Did this have something to do with the two trials-one jury scenario?

Later I was to learn that this was a intelligent but lesser used legal concept known as” joinder.”
“Joinder in criminal law is a legal term which refers to the inclusion of additional counts or additional defendants on an indictment. In English law, charges for any offense may be joined in the same indictment if those charges are founded on the same facts, or form or are a part of a series of offences of the same or a similar nature. A number of defendants may be joined in the same indictment even if no single count applies to all of them, provided that the counts are sufficiently linked. The judge retains the option to order separate trials.”

In practical terms, this means that when a person is on trial for criminal charges in more than one murder, as was the case here, this legal option may be used.  In our case, the evidence was strong with my Dad’s murder while the evidence with “the same cast of characters”in the second case  was weaker.  By using joinder, convictions can be facilitated by the stronger case carrying the weaker case. From written information on our case it appeared that the jury was able to differentiate the evidence and come to the conclusion that “the fish” most likely committed the second murder as portrayed.

Unintended Benefits

Several years ago, I was doing research at the law library for an Advanced Victimology Course and actually located my father’s case in a Connecticut  law journal.  How cool is that???  Although I would much rather have him with us today versus having his case appear in publication, it may in fact, serve to help others.

Another female well known public defender in our case (the “1st chair”) was kind enough to send me information for my paper when I requested it…. all these years later.  To have communication with “their side” was an eerie feeling.  Maybe, just maybe it was a small gesture of delayed justice.

Another FIRST

Within the first 48 Hours, there is always a whirlwind of activity when you are dealing with serious crime.  Family members are at there most vulnerable.  So, imagine, if you will, our family gathered around the television hearing reports about your very own father.  But, instead of stating his name, the local anchor man (not a hair out of place) reputation, suddenly stated his name as “Daniel” when his name was “Donald.”  We were horrified that such simple fact checking was not performed and another indignity was visited upon us.

Reality Check…. Nowadays, the media is a very different animal ,where almost anything goes in the most exploitative manner.  Such a seemingly small detail is enough to send you over the edge when your entire world is collapsing…  Daniel, Donald, it still matters to me.  It was my father.

Final FIRST

If you will, picture us in a packed courtroom, “word weary” after listening to nearly three weeks of testimony.  At the end of the day, the public defender (“2nd chair”) imposes upon the court an unusual request.  It seems that the perpetrator is inconvenienced each day with the proceedings in that, by the time he returns to his cell, his dinner is cold.  So, would the court consider ordering that the defendant receive hot food, please????

I do not have to tell you his response…. Enough said!

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.